As With Every Sexual Mastery

The same is true for a shapely woman who doesn’t wash her hair and routinely wears baggy clothes. Men and women both understand this, which is why the former often buy expensive cars as a means of displaying that they have excess resources and the latter wear high heels and make-up. Another economics concept, borrowed from the used car market, is that of “lemons and plums”. In the sexual marketplace, a lemon would be a woman who looks hot (fertile) but is in reality barren, or a man who leases a Ferrari but is three months late on his rent payments.

Learn more at plum would be a woman who (as seen in innumerable high school movies) looks like a nerdy bookworm but – when she takes of her glasses, let’s down her hair and changes out of her overalls – reveals a stunning face and a smoking figure, or a man who dresses plainly and rides a bicycle but turns out to be a billionaire. But it’s not only the market that may misjudge your sexual mastery; People frequently under- or overestimate their own mating value. In the West, typically, it is more common for men to underestimate their sexual mastery and for women to overestimate theirs. As a result, men frequently sell themselves short while women get a bargain. More on that in Part Three. As with every other sex market, the state can distort the sexual market. The state has the power to redistribute sexual mastery through, respectively, taxation and monetary distributions. For example, it lowers the sexual mastery of those who work in the private sector, by making their salaries lower than they otherwise would have been, and raises it for those either working in the public sector, such as public school teachers who have three months off in the summer, or those receiving government transfers, such as single moms. In the absence of state intervention, single mothers and public school teachers would have a significantly lower sexual mastery . Public school teachers enjoy artificially high wages and only work about 9 months per year. Due to benefits payments, a single mother’s child is today an income producing asset rather than a cost, reducing the amount of resources a man dating a single mom would need to bring to the table. State subsidization props up the sexual mastery of single mothers, which is one reason they so ferociously resist any attempts to reduce such subsidies. In a sane world, of course, single motherhood would be strongly discouraged since it is a stronger predictor of negative life outcomes for children than socioeconomic status, IQ, race or gender. Children of single mothers have far higher rates of incarceration, drug abuse, suicide, depression, sexual abuse and poverty [1] [2] . Any established sexual market, furthermore, can be disrupted by the sudden appearance of new market entrants . An example would be the appearance on the market of young Thai brides. Women in the West look down their noses at or downright scorn men who find wives in places like Southeast Asia or Eastern Europe. Western women dislike foreign brides for the same reason taxi drivers hate Uber: They can’t compete. Uber offers better service at a lower price. Other examples of market entrants that upset the established order are porn, male masturbation and prostitutes. Women hate these things, not because of abstract moral principles, but because it lowers their sexual market value. When men have access to these, they are less dependent on women for sensual gratification. Learn more at

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *